Talk:Media of Canada

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Media Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Mackay Radio Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments

To Whom it might concern: I restored the Canadian literature link to See Also, because while literature does not fall under the definition of media (hence why it is not in the article), it is related. What's consider media, newspapers, magazines, television, other than communicating news and opinions also features fiction which is literature, they are all a form of medium.

I also restored the external links format because that's more organized and the one I see as standard on the site.

Also, would linking media pages of Canadian provinces and cities under See Also be proper, I'm still pondering that. - Arsha Nos Mondelle

I removed the "See also Canadian literature" because I had included a link to Canadian literature in the body of the "Book and magazine publishing" section. It's only standard on Wikipedia to include a "See also" if a related link isn't already mentioned in the body of the article; if that link is already in there, then the "see also" is just redundant. Bearcat 23:35, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)