Reliable sources/Perennial sources

The beginning of the perennial sources list, with colours corresponding to the status of each source

Reliable sources/Perennial sources (abbreviated as RSP or WP:RSP) is a community-maintained list on English Wikipedia that classifies sources by degrees of reliability.[1][2] The ratings, which are determined through public discussion and consensus, have received significant news coverage over the years.[3][4][5]

RSP ratings are not meant to function as "pre-approved sources that can always be used without regard for the ordinary rules of editing", nor is RSP a "list of banned sources that can never be used or should be removed on sight".[2][4]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Lawrence-2024 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ a b Talbot, Margaret (4 March 2025). "Elon Musk Also Has a Problem with Wikipedia". The New Yorker. ISSN 0028-792X. Archived from the original on 1 May 2025. Retrieved 3 May 2025.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference Bandler-2024 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b Harrison, Stephen (1 July 2021). "Wikipedia's War on the Daily Mail". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Archived from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2025.
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference Breslow-2022 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search