The dodo became extinct during the mid-to-late 17th century due to habitat destruction, overhunting, and predation by introduced mammals.[1] It is an often-cited example of a human-driven extinction.[2]
The Holocene extinction, also referred to as the Anthropocene extinction[3][4] or the sixth mass extinction,[5][6] is an ongoing extinction event caused exclusively by human activities during the Holocene epoch.[7][8] This extinction event spans numerous families of plants[9][10][11] and animals, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and invertebrates, impacting both terrestrial and marine species.[12] Widespread degradation of biodiversity hotspots such as coral reefs and rainforests has exacerbated the crisis. Many of these extinctions are undocumented, as the species are often undiscovered before their extinctions.
The Holocene extinction was preceded by the Late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions (lasting from 50,000 to 10,000 years ago), in which many large mammals – including 81% of megaherbivores – went extinct, a decline attributed at least in part to human (anthropogenic) activities.[28][29] There continue to be strong debates about the relative importance of anthropogenic factors and climate change, but a recent review concluded that there is little evidence for a major role of climate change and "strong" evidence for human activities as the principal driver.[30] Examples from regions such as New Zealand, Madagascar, and Hawaii have shown how human colonization and habitat destruction have led to significant biodiversity losses.
In the 20th century, the human population quadrupled, and the global economy grew twenty-five-fold.[31][32] This period, often called the Great Acceleration, has intensified species' extinction.[33][34] Humanity has become an unprecedented "global superpredator",[35] preying on adult apex predators, invading habitats of other species,[36] and disrupting food webs.[37] As a consequence, many scientists have endorsed Paul Crutzen's concept of the Anthropocene to describe humanity's domination of the Earth.
Despite this grim outlook, there are efforts to mitigate biodiversity loss. Conservation initiatives, international treaties, and sustainable practices aim to address this crisis. However, these efforts do not counteract the fact that human activity still threatens to cause large amounts of damage to the biosphere, including potentially to the human species itself.
^Hollingsworth, Julia (June 11, 2019). "Almost 600 plant species have become extinct in the last 250 years". CNN. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2020. The research—published Monday in Nature, Ecology & Evolution journal—found that 571 plant species have disappeared from the wild worldwide, and that plant extinction is occurring up to 500 times faster than the rate it would without human intervention.
^McNeill, John Robert; Engelke, Peter (2016). The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945 (1st ed.). Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0674545038.
^Daly, Herman E.; Farley, Joshua C. (2010). Ecological economics, second edition: Principles and applications. Island Press. ISBN9781597266819.
^Stokstad, Erik (5 May 2019). "Landmark analysis documents the alarming global decline of nature". Science. AAAS. Archived from the original on 26 October 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2020. For the first time at a global scale, the report has ranked the causes of damage. Topping the list, changes in land use—principally agriculture—that have destroyed habitat. Second, hunting and other kinds of exploitation. These are followed by climate change, pollution, and invasive species, which are being spread by trade and other activities. Climate change will likely overtake the other threats in the next decades, the authors note. Driving these threats are the growing human population, which has doubled since 1970 to 7.6 billion, and consumption. (Per capita of use of materials is up 15% over the past 5 decades.)
^Cite error: The named reference Ceballos-Ehrlich-2017-05 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred; Keyßer, Lorenz T.; Steinberger, Julia K. (2020). "Scientists' warning on affluence". Nature Communications. 11 (3107): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC7305220. PMID32561753. The affluent citizens of the world are responsible for most environmental impacts and are central to any future prospect of retreating to safer environmental conditions . . . It is clear that prevailing capitalist, growth-driven economic systems have not only increased affluence since World War II, but have led to enormous increases in inequality, financial instability, resource consumption and environmental pressures on vital earth support systems.