 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,974 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 13 April 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 January 2024 by S0091 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by S0091 4 months ago. | |
Comment: The Forbes.com articles have been removed as references. I have added references from Forbes Magazine which are allowed under Wiki rules (please seeWP:Forbes). Also please review my comments here: Draft talk:R.J. Shook citations for Amazon, Abe books and Shook Research, and links to Dropbox were also removed. Additional sources have been added to establish SHOOK notability. Please send JohnnyDeadline Note on this subject: WHY RJ SHOOK WIKI SHOULD BE PUBLISHED User:JohnnyDeadline April 26
- Comment: I have sourced the items in the box mentioning R.J. Shook's background. They come from a primary source: his father. As previously mentioned, I have added references from Forbes Magazine which are allowed under Wiki rules (please seeWP:Forbes). I have also added additional source material about SHOOK Research and its rankings. User:JohnnyDeadline May 10
- Comment: The Forbes.com articles have been removed as references. I have added references from Forbes Magazine which are allowed under Wiki rules (please seeWP:Forbes). Also please review my comments here: Draft talk:R.J. Shook citations for Amazon, Abe books and Shook Research, and links to Dropbox were also removed. Additional sources have been added to establish SHOOK notability. Please send JohnnyDeadline Note on this subject: WHY RJ SHOOK WIKI SHOULD BE PUBLISHED User:JohnnyDeadline April 26
- Comment: I have sourced the items in the box mentioning R.J. Shook's background. They come from a primary source: his father. As previously mentioned, I have added references from Forbes Magazine which are allowed under Wiki rules (please seeWP:Forbes). I have also added additional source material about SHOOK Research and its rankings. User:JohnnyDeadline May 10
- Comment: interviews are not independent sources and confer zero notability. Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: See WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. The entire personal life section is unsourced. Greenman (talk) 09:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: None of the Forbes articles are reliable because they are sponsored content or are written by contributors rather than staff (see WP:FORBESCON) so should not be used. The following are also not reliable: commercial sites that sell products of offer services such Amazon, Abe books and Shook Research, press releases and links to Dropbox are not acceptable. Interviews or sources that that largely rely on what Shook or those affiliated with him say are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. S0091 (talk) 20:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The Forbes.com articles have been removed as references. I have added references from Forbes Magazine which are allowed under Wiki rules (please seeWP:Forbes). Also please review my comments here: Draft talk:R.J. Shook citations for Amazon, Abe books and Shook Research, and links to Dropbox were also removed. Additional sources have been added to establish SHOOK notability. Please send JohnnyDeadline Note on this subject: WHY RJ SHOOK WIKI SHOULD BE PUBLISHED User:JohnnyDeadline April 26
- Comment: I have sourced the items in the box mentioning R.J. Shook's background. They come from a primary source: his father. As previously mentioned, I have added references from Forbes Magazine which are allowed under Wiki rules (please seeWP:Forbes). I have also added additional source material about SHOOK Research and its rankings. User:JohnnyDeadline May 10
R.J. Shook | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | Columbus, Ohio, U.S.[1] |
| Education | Babson College[2] |
| Occupation(s) | Author, Researcher |
| Years active | 1987–present |
| Spouse | Elisabeth Shook |
| Parents |
|
| Website | www |
R.J. Shook is an American author and researcher who has spent decades studying and writing about the financial advice business. His company, SHOOK Research, identifies top financial advisors and ranks them nationally for Forbes magazine.[4][5][6][7]
- ^ Shook, Robert (17 October 2023). "An Interview with Robert Shook" (Interview). Interviewed by Mark Tatge. Chicago: Deadline Media.
- ^ Shook, Robert (17 October 2023). "An Interview with Robert Shook" (Interview). Interviewed by Mark Tatge. Chicago: Deadline Media.
- ^ Shook, Robert (17 October 2023). "An Interview with Robert Shook" (Interview). Interviewed by Mark Tatge. Chicago: Deadline Media.
- ^ "Forbes List Directory". Forbes via Forbes.com.
- ^ Calvey, Mark (17 February 2008). "Uncovering the Bay Area's Top Financial Advisors". San Francisco Business Times. Retrieved 6 February 2024.
- ^ Fritsch, Shane (7 April 2008). "Many Happy Returns". Chicago Magazine. Retrieved February 13, 2024.
- ^ Couturier, Brian (1 March 2019). "Stay calm and carry on, Advisers say investors should stay focused on long-term goals". Virginia Business. Retrieved 16 February 2024.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search