| Submission declined on 16 May 2024 by Bearcat (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. | &sq=starlink&lang=en&file=File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg){kind=logo} |
| Submission declined on 8 January 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 4 months ago. | |
Comment: Twitter, Instagram and Facebook posts are not reliable or WP:GNG-building sources. "Beyond the News" is a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person in a university student newspaper, so is not a GNG-building source; Mooney on Theatre is a blog, not a GNG-building source.
So the only acceptable sources here are Cinema Axis and The Hollywood Reporter, but they both just briefly mention her name without being about her in any meaningful sense, which means they aren't getting her over GNG either.
We're not looking for just any web page you can find that verifies a fact about her career: we're looking for evidence that the facts have caused journalists to write news stories about her. Bearcat (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Natalie Grace | |
|---|---|
| Born | Natalie Grace Goossen December 15, 1992 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
| Occupation(s) | Actress, Playwright |
| Years active | 2010–present |
Natalie Grace Goossen (born December 15 1992)..[1] is a Canadian actor and playwright. She is most known for her role as Moth on Chilling Adventures of Sabrina (TV series).
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search