 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,063 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 8 April 2025 by 1AmNobody24 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 5 March 2025 by Mcmatter (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by Mcmatter 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Still reads like an essay, could also benefit from inline citations. Nobody (talk) 05:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: The sources are not accessible, and this feels like it may be a copyright or original research both which are against our policies. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 20:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
The coal-direct chemical looping (CDCL) process seeks to produce more energy, while also reducing emissions from energy production, specifically from coal-fired plants. Chemical looping uses oxygen carrier particles to convert carbon fuels while also capturing carbon dioxide. This is done in a two-step process, with one step involving the usage of these oxygen carrier particles to react with the coal, enabling combustion. The other part of the process involves recycling non-oxidized particles by allowing them to react with air, and then being allowed to react with coal once more. A demonstration of this has been performed, specifically with the collaboration of the Advanced Research Projects Agency. Coal-direct chemical looping is a unique type of chemical looping combustion that uses two reactors, one specifically for the reduction process and another for the combustion process.[1] [2]
- ^ Tong, Andrew; Bayham, Samuel; Kathe, Mandar V.; Zeng, Liang; Luo, Siwei; Fan, Liang-Shih (2014-01-01). "Iron-based syngas chemical looping process and coal-direct chemical looping process development at Ohio State University". Applied Energy. 113: 1836–1845. Bibcode:2014ApEn..113.1836T. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.024. ISSN 0306-2619.
- ^ Zhang, Yitao; Wang, Dawei; Pottimurthy, Yaswanth; Kong, Fanhe; Hsieh, Tien-Lin; Sakadjian, Bartev; Chung, Cheng; Park, Cody; Xu, Dikai; Bao, Jinhua; Velazquez-Vargas, Luis; Guo, Mengqing; Sandvik, Peter; Nadgouda, Sourabh; Flynn, Thomas J. (2021-01-15). "Coal direct chemical looping process: 250 kW pilot-scale testing for power generation and carbon capture". Applied Energy. 282: 116065. Bibcode:2021ApEn..28216065Z. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116065. ISSN 0306-2619.
© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search